Talk:Epic Path: Difference between revisions

From Epic Path
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
Oh man are the alchemist discoveries old... just found one that granted alchemist level as a bonus to escape artist checks.  I fear we're going to need to do a full pass through them before long. [[User:Reese|Reese]] ([[User talk:Reese|talk]]) 13:52, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  What do you think of making the Quicken Spell line of metamagic (incl. the epic one) Sorc/Wiz only?  Are there any other caster classes that really need these feats to stay competitive? [[User:Reese|Reese]] ([[User talk:Reese|talk]]) 14:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  What do you think of making the Quicken Spell line of metamagic (incl. the epic one) Sorc/Wiz only?  Are there any other caster classes that really need these feats to stay competitive? [[User:Reese|Reese]] ([[User talk:Reese|talk]]) 14:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)


  When we move Initiative checks to Movement, we will need to clean up any naked bonuses to initiate (fighter's tactic, warlord's banner, feats, etc.) and convert them to bonuses to the Movement skillThese bonuses need to fall in line with normal skill bonuses.[[User:Reese|Reese]] ([[User talk:Reese|talk]]) 14:24, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  Do we want to have things that give a naked bonus to initiative only, and not to Movement as a whole?  This complicates the character sheet, but does give us an extra knob to turnIn any event, current bonuses to initiative would need to be brought in line with skill bonus limitations, and re-typed to fit within the possible bonuses for a skill. [[User:Reese|Reese]] ([[User talk:Reese|talk]]) 13:57, 20 November 2018 (UTC)


=='Finishing' Epic Path==
=='Finishing' Epic Path==

Revision as of 13:57, 20 November 2018