Talk:Epic Path: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
For the record, I'm speaking ONLY about quicken, and epic quicken. I'd be open to also allowing them for Clerics and Druids (basically full casters only), but the bard already gets Spellsong, which is arguably better than quicken, and the Paladin gets a ton of immediate spells. The ranger and alchemist... well, I could see how they'd want to improve their "casting" action economy, but I'm not sure quicken really makes sense for them, thematically. Maybe give them some other way to do that? | For the record, I'm speaking ONLY about quicken, and epic quicken. I'd be open to also allowing them for Clerics and Druids (basically full casters only), but the bard already gets Spellsong, which is arguably better than quicken, and the Paladin gets a ton of immediate spells. The ranger and alchemist... well, I could see how they'd want to improve their "casting" action economy, but I'm not sure quicken really makes sense for them, thematically. Maybe give them some other way to do that? | ||
Hrrm. All right, Quicken and Multispell are 'full casters only'. Cleric, Druid, Sorc, Wiz. The demicasters either get other tricks (immediates), or, are just not that good at "magic". This is a good change, good thinkin'. :D As for the mechanical 'casters', Alcs and rangers, maybe make a 'competent combiner' feat that is effectively quicken? This is very optional in my books, the demi-casters get plenty of other tricks. | |||
=='Finishing' Epic Path== | =='Finishing' Epic Path== | ||