Talk:Epic Path: Difference between revisions

From Epic Path
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
What do you think of making the Quicken Spell line of metamagic (incl. the epic one) Sorc/Wiz only?  Are there any other caster classes that really need these feats to stay competitive? [[User:Reese|Reese]] ([[User talk:Reese|talk]]) 14:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Need to rewrite selective (again): first one is free, all others inflict -1 caster level to damage dealt and -1 to save DC, per person excluded.
 
That's a tough one. I'm leaning to have all metamagics open to all casters, but I could see the other side, too.
 
For the record, I'm speaking ONLY about quicken, and epic quicken.  I'd be open to also allowing them for Clerics and Druids (basically full casters only), but the bard already gets Spellsong, which is arguably better than quicken, and the Paladin gets a ton of immediate spells. The ranger and alchemist... well, I could see how they'd want to improve their "casting" action economy, but I'm not sure quicken really makes sense for them, thematically.  Maybe give them some other way to do that?
 
Hrrm. All right, Quicken and Multispell are 'full casters only'.  Cleric, Druid, Sorc, Wiz. The demicasters either get other tricks (immediates), or, are just not that good at "magic". This is a good change, good thinkin'. :D  As for the mechanical 'casters', Alcs and rangers, maybe make a 'competent combiner' feat that is effectively quicken?  This is very optional in my books, the demi-casters get plenty of other tricks.


=='Finishing' Epic Path==
=='Finishing' Epic Path==

Revision as of 22:46, 7 December 2018

Retrieved from "https://www.epicpath.org/index.php?title=Talk:Epic_Path&oldid=107538"